Management Cybernetics

Cybernetic management - as less harmful management as possible

Nice platform to allow people interested in the field to communicate and share. It is not fomally leaded, but rely on self organization.

Disclaimer

Creative Commons License

if other is mentioned

Members

Blog Posts

Innovative Management Cybernetics

Posted by Bhuvaneshwar Joshi on August 18, 2014 at 4:40pm

Whether advantages of Internet?

Posted by Bhuvaneshwar Joshi on April 28, 2014 at 9:50am

Classification of Human Thinkers

Posted by Bhuvaneshwar Joshi on January 10, 2014 at 9:28am

Robust Info Systems

Posted by Bhuvaneshwar Joshi on November 29, 2013 at 4:50pm

 

Latest Activity

Bhuvaneshwar Joshi posted a blog post

Innovative Management Cybernetics

Why is there a need to add the word ‘Innovation” to  Management  Cybernetics? Cybernetics as explained by Professor Stafford Beer is the science of self organizing systems (systems S!,S2, S3, S4,and S5). While S3 concerns itself with managing (planning, organizing, evaluating) the present system as designed, S4 deals with the designing future systems. The decision of select the redesign and time its introduction rests with the S5 .Basically one is distinguishing between homeostatic  and home…See More
Thursday
Michael J hall commented on Leonid Ototsky's blog post Stafford Beer in memoriam – “An argument of change” three decades on
"I have been out of the loop for a while but now trying to catch up with all the Management Cybernetics sights. I can recommend Eden Medina's book 'Cybernetic Revolutionaries' for a history of Cybersyn and Stafford's time in Chile."
Aug 22
Adler Jorge is now a member of Management Cybernetics
Jul 9
Profile IconManuel Arturo Jiménez Ramírez and Nicholas Couchman joined Management Cybernetics
May 21

A problem

Hello all!

I suggest that most of you know from "Heart of the Enterprise" that the cornerstone of VSM is variety management.

But how to define this variety is still out of my knowledge. Stafford Beer as I know clearly defines only minimum variety level as actuality, capability and potentiality. Is it enough for management, is it enough for a system as whole? How to check it without crisis?

If you know more about variety, how to define necessary variety or what should be controlled in obligatory manner, please share it in Variety analysis and management discussion

Preliminary answer - Variety is what system see. But there should be already done somehow formalised agreement between different viewers (systems) and viewpoints based on their experience in different contexts. Do you known anything about?
------------------
Всем привет!

Я думаю, что многие из вас читали "Сердце предприятия" и увидели, что управление разнообразием есть суть жизнеспособной системы.

Но как определить тот необходимый уровень разнообразия все еще открытый вопрос для меня. Конечно, Стаффорд Бир определил три важнейших индекса: actuality, capability и potentiality. Но достаточно ли этого для управления, для всей системы в целом?

Если есть мысли о разнообразии, как определить этот уровень, что должно контроллироваться системой в обязательном порядке, пожалуйста поделитесь в конференции Variety analysis and management.

Предварительным ответом можно считать, что разнообразие определяется самой системой, но должен быть накопленный и хотя бы немного формализованный опыт оценки разнообразия в различных контекстах.

Forum

Ning Pricing concern

Started by Arsenij Krasikov in Сообщество Apr 14.

Assol'-IPS

Started by Сайфуллин Назым Ф. in Сообщество Jan 20, 2013.

Variety analysis and managment 6 Replies

Started by Arsenij Krasikov in Кибернетика. Last reply by Борис Nov 14, 2011.

ВЭБ-семинар по ОГАС !

Started by Отоцкий Леонид Нисонович in Сообщество Mar 27, 2011.

 
 
 

© 2014   Created by Arsenij Krasikov.   Powered by

Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service